<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>abrahamhyatt.com &#187; Our PDX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abrahamhyatt.com/category/our-pdx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abrahamhyatt.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New post on OurPDX: The fate of the little guy</title>
		<link>http://abrahamhyatt.com/2009/03/new-post-on-ourpdx-the-fate-of-the-little-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://abrahamhyatt.com/2009/03/new-post-on-ourpdx-the-fate-of-the-little-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abraham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our PDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[niche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ourpdx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abrahamhyatt.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at OurPDX I&#8217;ve written a piece about the fate of niche publications in light of the larger crisis in the newspaper industry. I use Just Out, Portland&#8217;s leading gay and lesbian newspaper, as an example of the difficulties niche papers face, and how a digital future is a scary place: The problem is, print [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-child "><span title="O" class="cap"><span>O</span></span>ver at <a href="http://ourpdx.com">OurPDX</a> I&#8217;ve written a piece about the fate of niche publications in light of the larger crisis in the newspaper industry. I use Just Out, Portland&#8217;s leading gay and lesbian newspaper, as an example of the difficulties niche papers face, and how a digital future is a scary place:</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-490" style="margin-right: 20px;" title="justout_march20" src="http://abrahamhyatt.com/wp-content/uploads//justout_march20-233x300.jpg" alt="justout_march20" width="150" height="194" /><em>The problem is, print media is tragically unable to find online ad dollars. Tom Corbett, an analyst with Morningstar, estimates that in 2008, print publishers made 1.7 cents in online ad revenue for every dollar they lost.  That’s like walking 1.7 feet forward only to turn around and sprint 100 feet in the other direction. Niche publications can barely stand to lose inches, much less feet. Those with viable digital revenue models are … I don’t know. I haven’t seen any.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://ourpdx.com/2009/03/little-newspaper-save-thyself/">Read the rest at OurPDX.</a>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabrahamhyatt.com%2F2009%2F03%2Fnew-post-on-ourpdx-the-fate-of-the-little-guy%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabrahamhyatt.com%2F2009%2F03%2Fnew-post-on-ourpdx-the-fate-of-the-little-guy%2F&amp;source=abrahamhyatt&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;space=16" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://abrahamhyatt.com/2009/03/new-post-on-ourpdx-the-fate-of-the-little-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New post on OurPDX: Sam Adams, transparency and Twitter</title>
		<link>http://abrahamhyatt.com/2009/01/new-post-on-ourpdx-sam-adams-transparency-and-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://abrahamhyatt.com/2009/01/new-post-on-ourpdx-sam-adams-transparency-and-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abraham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our PDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Sam Adams"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blagovich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ourpdx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abrahamhyatt.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Twitter could have given Sam, and Portland -By abrahamhyatt on -January 29th, 2009 Late last month, when the whole Gov. Blagovich indictment situation was threatening to taint Barack Obama’s transition, two writers at the Politico put together a list of “five rules of scandal response” that the president-to-be had intentionally, or unintentionally, imposed on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 class="post-title" style="padding-left: 30px;"><a title="What Twitter could have given Sam, and Portland" href="http://ourpdx.net/2009/01/what-twitter-could-have-given-sam-and-portland/">What Twitter could have given Sam, and Portland</a></h2>
<p class="byline" style="padding-left: 30px;">-By			<span class="author"> <a title="Posts by abrahamhyatt" href="http://ourpdx.net/author/abrahamhyatt/">abrahamhyatt</a></span> on<br />
<span class="time"> -January 29th, 2009</span></p>
<p class="first-child " style="padding-left: 30px;"><a title="Edit post" href="http://ourpdx.net/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&amp;post=3203"></a></p>
<div class="entry" style="padding-left: 30px;"><span title="L" class="cap"><span>L</span></span>ate last month, when the whole Gov. Blagovich indictment situation was threatening to taint Barack Obama’s transition, two writers at the Politico put together a list of “<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16836.html">five rules of scandal response</a>” that the president-to-be had intentionally, or unintentionally, imposed on his staff. Rule No. 1 was simple: “Be transparent, to an extent.”</p>
<p>Sam Adams didn’t get that memo. As the opening days of the Breedlove scandal unfolded, Adams hid. He hid from the press, from his critics and from his city. And it’s too bad, because whether you support the mayor or not, he had an incredible communications tool at his fingertips: <a href="http://twitter.com/MayorSamAdams">his Twitter account</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://ourpdx.net/2009/01/what-twitter-could-have-given-sam-and-portland">Continue reading&#8230;</a></div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabrahamhyatt.com%2F2009%2F01%2Fnew-post-on-ourpdx-sam-adams-transparency-and-twitter%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabrahamhyatt.com%2F2009%2F01%2Fnew-post-on-ourpdx-sam-adams-transparency-and-twitter%2F&amp;source=abrahamhyatt&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;space=16" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://abrahamhyatt.com/2009/01/new-post-on-ourpdx-sam-adams-transparency-and-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
